![]() Of the people that went with the more "advanced" package- which was a big majority- only a few ended up using it on a regular basis. I remember when I first looked into getting loudspeaker software 3 years ago there was a group buy on Madisound board, and everybody was weighing the pros and cons of those two packages (some things seem to never change ). There were like 3 major versions since I played with it. My advice would be get lspCAD now, learn it, and upgrade when ver. It will keep all the cool features of the current version and add a few others that Sound Easy don't have. Not as intuitive to work with.Ī new version of lspCAD is coming. There you have to generate graphs in succession. You skip through crossover components values using your arrow keys (another priceless feature) and see immediatetely what happens to all the graphs. For example, you have the "combined frequency response", "polar pattern", "individual phase response" windows open at the same time and tiled on your desktop. This is a priceless feature for guys who like to experiment. ![]() I use lspCAD pro and grew to love certain features of the program that are unique to it.įor one, the structure of the program allows you to see how changing one parameter affects multiple aspects of the design. Sound Easy seem to have more input fields though. Both of them will give you the same results given the same input. If you are a beginer to intermediate loudspeaker builder and would like to learn more about crossovers, get immediate feedback on "what if." scenarios and roll your own crossovers the first week, get lspCAD. If you are an EE and know a lot about loudspeaker/crossover construction you will feel at home with Sound Easy. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2023
Categories |